Example sample tables
Use the tables below as inspiration for your own sample table.
An empty, editable MEX1 sample table can be found here
MEX1 transmission samples examples
Sample form | Edge | Analysis mode | Concentration | K max | Environment | Scans | Time/Scan (hrs) | Total (hrs) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W metal (model compound) diluted with cellulose | 7 mm pellet | W L3 | T | Δμd= 1.35 | XANES only | RT | 2 | 0.25 | 0.5 |
Sc2O3 (model compound) diluted with cellulose | 7 mm pellet | Sc K | T | Δμd= 0.35 | 18 | RT | 2 | 0.75 | 1.5 |
3 x Fe-bearing model compounds diluted with cellulose | 7 mm pellet | Fe K | T | Δμd= 0.83 - 1.05 | XANES only | cryo | 3 x 2 = 6 | 0.25 | 1.5 |
4 x CeO2 catalysts diluted with cellulose | 7 mm pellet | Ce L3 | T | Δμd= 0.47 | 16 | RT | 4 x 2 = 8 | 0.25 | 2 |
16 soil samples diluted with cellulose | 7 mm pellet | Fe K | T | Δμd= 0.35 - 0.97 | XANES only | RT | 16 x 2 = 32 | 0.5 | 16 |
30 wt% Pt0.14Ni0.86 on carbon, diluted with cellulose | 7 mm pellet | Ni K | T | Δμd= 0.85 | 20 | cryo | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Radiation hardness testing (hrs) | 2 | ||||||||
Beamline setup and training (hrs) | 4 | ||||||||
Total time requested | 23.5 hours (3 shifts) | ||||||||
MEX1 fluorescence sample examples
Sample | Sample form | Edge | Analysis mode | Concentration | K max | Environment | Scans | Time/Scan (hrs) | Total (hrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FeS2 diluted with cellulose | 7 mm pellet | Fe K | F | 32 % w/w, diluted in cellulose to 0.1% = 1000 ppm | 18 | RT | 3 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
Blood samples x 10 | Liquid | Hg L3 | F | 0.1 mM | 16 | cryo | 10 x 6 | 1 | 60 |
Beamline setup and training (hrs) | 4 | ||||||||
Total time requested | 65.5 hours | ||||||||
MEX1 simultaneous fluorescence and transmission sample examples
Sample | Sample form | Edge | Analysis mode | K max | Environment | Concentration | Scans | Time/Scan (hrs) | Total (hrs) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
μTd | Δμd | mass fraction | |||||||||
16 x Soil samples diluted with cellulose | 13 mm pellet | Fe K | F & T | XANES only | RT | 1.5
| 0.154 | Fe = 3500 ppm | 2 x 16 = 32 | 0.5 | 16 |
Over-absorption characterisation (Grazing exit) | 4 | ||||||||||
Beamline setup and training (hrs) | 4 | ||||||||||
Total time requested | 24 hours (3 shifts) | ||||||||||
How to represent measuring different edges in the same sample in the sample table?
Sample | Sample form | Edge | Analysis mode | k max | sample | μTd | Δμd | mass fraction | number of scans | time per scan (minutes) | total time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yb-doped | 7 mm pellet | Yb L3 | F | 18 | RT | - | - | ~2200 ppm Yb | 3 | 20 mins | 1 |
Zn K | T | 16 | 1.08 | 0.19 |
| 2 | 9 mins | 0.3 | |||
Fe K | T | 16 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 9 mins | 0.3 |
Merge the sample, sample form and sample environment cells. This makes it obvious to the reader that the samples are linked.
You MUST have one row per edge, and it MUST contain either μTd AND Δμd, OR mass fraction OR all three.
You calculations for edge step, total absorption and concentration MUST be internally consistent. That means the mass of sample + dilutant must be identical in the calculations for the different edges.
In this example a Yb-doped zinc ferrite spinel will be subject to Yb L3, Fe K and Zn K analysis. The dilution ratio of 30 parts cellulose to 1 part sample was chosen such that the Yb concentration was in the vicinity of 2000 ppm, suitable for fluorescence. Various values for total absorption were investigated for the Zn and Fe K-edges, until a pair of values were found that gave an identical mass for the pellet that was in the vicinity of 40 mg, simultaneously producing edge steps for both Fe and Zn were greater than 0.1, and total absorption <2.5.
MEX1 Microprobe sample table example (click here for more information)
Scan type | Details | Sample | Sample Form | Edge: Element(s) | Scan Dimensions, mm | Spot size, mm | Pixel Pitch, mm | Dwell, sec | Row Pitch, mm | Scan | Nos. Incident | Nos. scans | TOTAL SCAN TIME |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Map | Coarse (overview) map. | Volcanic sand grains | Petrographic section (30 µm thick) | K-edge: Ti, Fe | 3 x 3 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 150 mins | 1 | 1 | 150 mins |
Point XANES | Single point XANES on regions identified from the overview scan. | K-edge: Ti | Fixed point | 0.02 | na | 1 | na | 2 mins | 100 | 10 | 20 mins | ||
K-edge: Ti | 0.02 | na | 0.5 | na | 1 mins | 120 | 20 | 20 mins | |||||
XANES map | A small area of the overview scan remapped at a range of incident energies. | K-edge: Fe | 0.22 x 0.2 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.02 | 0.005 | 1 mins | 100 | 4 | 240 mins | ||
Map | Coarse (overview) map. | Flag leaf, wheat (Triticum aestivum) | Intact, whole leaf | K-edge: K, Ca, Mn, Zn | 5 x 2 | 0.005 | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.1 | 4 mins | 1 | 20 | 85 mins |
Map | Higher definition (high detail) map of the stoma identified in the over scans. | 0.5 x 0.5 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 10 mins | 1 | 36 | 375 mins | |||
Point XANES | Single point XANES centred on the stoma as identified from the maps. | K-edge: Ca | Fixed point | 0.01 | na | 2 | na | 4 mins |